← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22921/2020rejected

Md. Israil @ Lal Bano @ Lal Babu v. The State Of Bihar

2020-11-10Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22921 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2019 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== MD. ISRAIL @ LAL BANO @ LAL BABU Son of Late Yaqub Resident of Village-Kharabari Udgara, P.S.-Pothia, District-Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bisheshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pothia P.S. Case No. 109 of 2019 giving rise to Session Trial No. 157 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner had been rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.12.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 76000 of 2019. Again the prayer for bail has been filed on the ground of custody as well as the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22921 of 2020(3) dt.10-11-2020 2/2 status of pending trial. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 12.08.2019.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner has been refused considering the merit of the case and now no fresh ground is made out to entertain this second prayer of the petitioner. Moreover, the witnesses are being examined in the trial and the trail will be concluded soon which is evident from the report received from the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge-2nd , Kishanganj at Flag-X.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T