Paras Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29569 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2015 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Paras Sahni S/o late Khelawan Sahni R/o Mahindrabara Tola Harinagar, P.S. Runnisaidpur, District Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 10-11-2016 Heard Mr. Sharma for the petitioner and Mr. Dayal, APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2015 registered under sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the first information report which was lodged in connection with something which happened 12 years ago. The person who was to sell the land did not sell the land in favour of the informant and subsequently it was sold in favour of the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. From the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner was granted the benefit of Section 41(1) of the Cr.P.C. The learned Sessions Judge having regard to that while disposing of the bail application made observation in paragraph 7 of the said order.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29569 of 2016 (4) dt.10-11-2016 2/2 Mr. Dayal states that in view of the above as also the fact that in course of investigation, the petitioner was given the benefit of Section 41(1) of Cr.P.C., he has no reasonable apprehension.

In the light of the observation made in the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge, the bail application is disposed of permitting the petitioner to surrender and seek bail. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T