Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31828/2017rejected

Ranjit Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31828 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31828 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2006 Thana -RAJNAGAR District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Ranjan Son of Dharmnath Yadav Resident of Village-Bellahi P.S. jainagar District-Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Soban Asghar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umeshnand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2.

13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in relation to Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 44/2006, G.R. No. 504/2006, T. R. No. 1999/2017 registered under Sections 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of the Bihar Examination Act, 1991, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate - 1st, Madhubani.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the First Information Report although it is alleged that the student having roll number 416 was appearing in place of student bearing roll number 415 but the name has not been disclosed in the First Information Report.

A perusal of the impugned order passed by the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31828 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 learned Sessions Judge would show that this case is of the year 2006, and on perusal of the case diary, it was found that there are materials against the petitioner and the petitioner has already been charge-sheeted in the present case.

This being the position, I am not inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner after lapse of about 11 years. Let the petitioner surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and prays for regular bail, the learned Magistrate shall consider the entire materials collected in course of investigation and shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law without being prejudice that the Anticipatory Bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T