Dinesh Ram @ Dinesh Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33319 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2020 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Dinesh Ram @ Dinesh Kumar Ram, S/o Deo Pujan Ram, R/o Village Bhundhari, P.S. Ekma, District Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Md. Ataur Rahman, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Shashank Chandra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual court proceedings.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ekma P.S. Case No.198 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant named altogether nine persons and alleged that the accused persons apprehended him and snatched

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33319 of 2021(2) dt.27-01-2022 2/3 Rs.10,000/- from his possession. Deo Pujan Ram is said to have assaulted the informant with knife on his nose. The informant further alleged that the petitioner also assaulted his father with knife.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused person has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by a different coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.03.2021, passed in Cr. Misc. No.34118 of 2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the father of the informant by means of knife but nothing is mentioned about the injury sustained by the father of the informant in the impugned order.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by a different co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33319 of 2021(2) dt.27-01-2022 3/3 surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.- 1, Saran at Chapra in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No.198 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T