The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited v. Subhash Chandra Jha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Appeal No.223 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited AtReliance Center, 19 Walchand Hirachand Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai400001. 2.

The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, At301-302, 3rd Floor, Kaushalya Estate, Dak Bunglow Chowraha, Bandar Bigha, Patna-800 001. Appeal and Appellant through Authorized Signatory/Duly Constituted Attorney, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, 163, Thapar House, 4th Floor, SP Mukherjee Road (Mudiali Kalighat) Kolkata-700026 (West Bengal).

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Subhash Chandra Jha son of Suresh Jha, resident of Village-Kiul, P.O.- Garahara, P.S.-Barauni, District-Begusarai (Bihar). 2.

Ram Gopal Sharma, son of Ratan Chandra Sharma @ Ratan Chand Sharma, Resident of 687/2013, Patle Nagar, City Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (Owner).

3.

Girja Pal @ Girraj Pal @ Giriraj Pal, son of Shankar Pal, resident of Mohalla-Murkhera (Karsena), P.S.-Subhash Pura, District-Shivpur, Madhya Pradesh, at present Residing at Gangaram Ka Makan, Krishna Colony, Farshwali Gali, Gadh Kampu, Gwalior (Driver). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present appeal has been preferred:

"against the Judgment/Award dated 28.11.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-XI-cum-Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Begusarai in M.A.C. Case No.

53 of 2015/56 of 2015 by which compensation has been allowed against the appellant."

Patna High Court MA No.223 of 2024(4) dt.10-10-2025 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal.

4. Accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

5. The statutory amount deposited has to be returned to the appellant.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U