Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24575 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2024 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Subhash Singh @ Raj Kishor Singh @ Ram Kishor Singh @ Subash Singh Resident of Village- Parariya, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Dhananjay Kr. No. 2, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Dhananjay Kr. No. 2, learned counsel for the informant and Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 06.02.2026 in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 457 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 05.12.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along with other accused persons armed with weapons have assaulted the informant and her family members due to which they
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24575 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3 sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he along with other accused persons have assaulted the informant and her family members and son of the informant has received injury but his injury report suggest that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026.
5. The learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has participated in the present crime in question and apart from that the petitioner carries three criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits that he is on bail in all the pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Sikrahana, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24575 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 457 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T