← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24486/2022bail granted

Md. Nehal v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-10Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24486 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-975 Year-2021 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

MD. NEHAL S/o Md Mushtaque Ansari Resodent of Village- Hajratganj (Near Mahammadiya Masjid, P.S.- K. Hat (Sahayak), District- Purnea. 2.

MD ROHIT @ ROHIT S/o Farooque Resident of Village- Hajratganj (Near Biscuit factory), P.s.- K. Hat (Sahayak), District- Purnea 3.

MD SALIM S/o Md Anwar Resident of Village- Lal Khan Tola (Near Rainbow coaching), Ward No.42, K. Hat (Sahayak), District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition of petitioner no.1. Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the petition of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos.2 and 3 and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner nos.2 and 3 are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24486 of 2022(2) dt.10-10-2022 2/2 Allegedly, it is a case of assault upon the informant and his son, due to which they sustained injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, namely, Md. Rohit alias Rohit and Md. Salim, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Purnea in connection with K.Hat (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 975 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T