Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24689 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2022 Thana- HARLAKHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Prince Kumar Singh @ Prince Kumar @ Golu Son Of Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjit Singh Resident Of Village - Kasabo, P.S. - Barauni, Distt. - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27, 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case in nutshell, is that while the informant along with his brother were going to home on motorcycle after closing their shop, in the meantime, two miscreants came on motorcycle and one of them fired upon the informant's brother due to which he sustained gun shot injury. Thereafter, this case has been registered against unknown.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24689 of 2023(4) dt.04-10-2023 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. The petitioner is not named in FIR rather his name came into light in this case on the basis of confessional statement of other coaccused person, namely, Rohit Yadav who has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.02.2023. in Cr. Misc. No. 70734 of 2022. Nothing incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 31.01.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No. 228 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-I, Benipatti, Madhubani.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T