Azima Beba @ Mausi @ Mausami v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21901 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2011 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== AZIMA BEBA @ MAUSI @ MAUSAMI, aged about 70 years (Female), Wife of Late Munsur Shekh, Resident of Mirzapur, P.S-Beldong, DistrictMurshidabad, (West Bengal). ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Shivendra Prasad, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.07.2018 in the present case in a case for the offence registered under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of the Immoral Traffic Act. Later on, Sections 371, 372 and 373 of the IPC were also added.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that one Purnima Barui @ Chandani was caught by the police who disclosed that she was purchased by one Panchu Singh for the purposes of flesh trade. Petitioner was associate of one Rahul @ Raj in selling the informant to Panchu Singh.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21901 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been remanded in the present case on 20.07.2018. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The petitioner has been made accused in the present case due to mistake of fact. There is no substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 196/2011. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T