Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29892/2012allowed

Sakir Ekbal @ Shakir Eqbal @ Pappu And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-03-27Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29892 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Sakir Ekbal @ Shakir Eqbal @ Pappu S/O Late Abdul Shakoor Resident Of Mohalla-Larkania Tola, P.S And District-Katihar

2. Md. Sajid @ Mintu S/O Late Abdul Shakoor Resident Of MohallaLarkania Tola, P.S And District-Katihar

3. Md. Shahnawaz @ Chunnu S/O Late Abdul Shakoor Resident Of Mohalla-Larkania Tola, P.S And District-Katihar

4. Hena Tabassum @ Daboo W/O Md. Sajid Resident Of Station Road, Ward No,.18, District-Araria

5. Shabana Parween W/O-Zeyaul Rahman Resident Of Mohalla-Hatha Pada, Near Eqbal Modi,Harnaut .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Bihar &

2. Naushi Farida D/o Abdul Mannan resident of Mohalla Maurya Ghat, police station kotwali, district Gaya. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Zeyaul Hoda For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2015 Petitioners pray for quashing of the cognizance order dated 2.6.2012, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in GR No. 416 of 2012, Tr.No.2358 of 2012 by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for offences under section 498A of the IPC and 3⁄4 pf the DP Act.

On 30.10.2012 the matter had been referred to the Patna High Court, Medication/Conciliation Centre. Today, in spite of notice, no one appears for the opposite party. Counsel for the petitioners refers to a mediation report dated 27.2.2013 along with a compromise petition stating that the dispute between the parties has been resolved through the process of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29892 of 2012 (4) dt.27-03-2015 2/2 mediation in terms of settlement mutually agreed upon by them. In paragraph 8 and 10 thereof, the parties have agreed to withdraw their respective cases filed against each other in terms of the agreement.

In view of the aforesaid development, cognizance order dated 2.6.2012, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in GR No. 416 of 2012, Tr.No.2358 of 2012 taken against the petitioners for offences under section 498A of the IPC and 3⁄4 pf the DP Act, is hereby quashed.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Shashi.

U T