Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24775/2023bail rejected

Sanjay Manjhi @ Sanjay Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-19Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24775 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2022 Thana- SINDHIYA District- Samastipur ====================================================== SANJAY MANJHI @ SANJAY KUMAR MANJHI Son of Late Hit Lal Manjhi Resident of village-Baluaha Ward No. 14, Police Station-Singhiya, District-Samastipur (Mobile No. 9771393191) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jagdish Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The informant alleges that a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the house of the petitioner and a stolen Bolero was recovered from the garage of Md. Mofiz, it is next alleged that Md. Mofiz, who is the owner of the garage, also disclosed that the Bolero was kept in the garage by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24775 of 2023(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the seizure list, it would manifest that the alleged motorcycle was not seized in presence of any of the family members of the petitioner.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the state opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner and submits that there is direct allegation of recovery of stolen motorcycle from the house of the petitioner and the seizure list has been signed by the co-villagers as would be evident from the seizure itself.

7. Considering the submissions of the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T