← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25352/2026bail granted

Ameenuddeen v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-17Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25352 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2025 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Ameenuddeen S/O Md. Tayyab @ Tayyab Resident of Kakhruwa, Malharia, P.S. - Baisi, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Meena Singh, APP For the Informant :

Md. Fazle Karim, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 520 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted the informant with an iron rod on his head causing grievous injury.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and no such incident as alleged has occurred. It has further been submitted that though the allegation of assault upon the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25352 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 informant with an iron rod on his head is stated however from the perusal of the injury report, it would be evident that the injuries were found to be simple in nature. It has further been submitted that there was a counter case also lodged on behalf of the petitioner's side for the said occurrence and it was due to the land dispute, the present occurrence has occurred and both the sides have received injuries. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant as well as the learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and has stated that there is specific allegation of assault upon the petitioner causing head injury. It has further been submitted that the petitioner and others were all found to be armed and they had the intention to cause injury or even kill the informant and the others.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances and taking into account the injury report and the clean antecedent of the petitioner, he is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25352 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 520 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner and the other shall be a local resident:

(ii) the petitioner will remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court and shall cooperate in the investigation;

(iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;

(iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same on in the name of verification.

(v) If the petitioner, in future, is found to be involved in similar nature of offence, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Tannu/- U T