Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26760 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- Manikpur District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Son of Daroga Yada @ Darogi Yadav Resident of village - Nista, P.S.- Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai 2.

Monu Kumar Son of Daroga Yada @ Darogi Yadav Resident of village - Nista, P.S.- Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Khushi Awadh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(5), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per FIR, petitioner alleged to demand extortion money from informant and also snatch Rs. 25,000/- from his pocket during the occurrence and also assaulted him causing bodily injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the allegation qua demanding

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26760 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/3 extortion and also to snatch cash and further of assaulting is available against named accused persons Sonu Kumar and Santosh Yadav. It is submitted that no allegation, in terms of FIR appears available against petitioners either qua extortion or assault. It is submitted that both petitioners are brother of co-accused Sonu Kumar and out of oblique motive just to harass entire family, petitioners were implicated with the present crime in question in very general and omnibus manner. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that petitioner no. 1 found involved in two more criminal cases where he is on bail and petitioner no. 2 found involved in three more cases, where he is on bail.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as prima-facie allegation of extortion and assault not appears available against petitioners rather against other named co-accused persons, accordingly both above-named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26760 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 3/3 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-II, Lakhisarai/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of BNSS. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Tripathi/- U T