Anandi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34262 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-469 Year-2019 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

ANANDI YADAV Son of Late Nakchhedi Yadav Resident of Village- Amha Tola- Ekghara, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul 2.

JAY KUMAR YADAV @ JAY KUMAR Son of Anandi Yadav Resident of Village- Amha Tola- Ekghara, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul 3.

MANJUSHA DEVI D/o Anandi Yadav Resident of Village- Amha TolaEkghara, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul 4.

SITA DEVI W/o Anandi Yadav Resident of Village- Amha Tola- Ekghara, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 427, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution allegation, in short, is that the accused persons, variously armed, assaulted the informant and his son due to which they sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34262 of 2021(2) dt.12-04-2022 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. So far petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, the injury caused by them are said to be simple in nature. Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are ladies. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 5.7.2019 for which F.I.R. was instituted on 11.7.2019. The delay has not been explained by the prosecution.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 469 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T