Vakil Kumar @ Vikal Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23424 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-864 Year-2024 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Vakil Kumar @ Vikal Ray S/O Vasudeo Ray @ Late Brahmdeo Ray R/O Village- Anandpur Tekaha, P.S- Bihta, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamlesh Prasad Yadav For the State :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 121(2), 132, 191(2) and 190 of B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he along with the police force during a liquor raid apprehended Madan and Ranjit, when named accused persons including the petitioner along with 10 unknown accused came and tried to free the apprehended accused and also assaulted the police force.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23424 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that since petitioner is a resident of a place nearby to the place of occurrence, as such, he came to be implicated, when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. Sri Rabindra Kumar opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-II, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P. S. Case No.864 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T