Niraj Kumar Singh @ Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24746 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2020 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH @ NIRAJ KUMAR Son of Late Basant Singh Resident of Village - Kumarpur, P.s.- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 160/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 341/323/328/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Bhagalpur. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24746 of 2022(2) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that no one has assaulted the son of the informant though the son of the informant, namely, Chaklesh Singh daily after taking drink started abusing to the neighbour due to that reason quarrel was made with the son of the informant and others every day.
Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner, he does not deserve anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T