Pramod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21764 of 2020 Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-106 Year-2020 Thana-Jagdishpur District-Bhojpur ====================================================== Pramod Kumar Singh, son of Nand Ji Singh, resident of village Saraiya Tola, P.S. Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party :

Mrs.(Dr.) Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-08-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2020, corresponding to Excise Case No. 727 of 2020, disclosing offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. In view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in case of Ram Vinay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2019(2) PLJR 1089 (F.B.), and the provisions under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, this application for anticipatory bail cannot be maintained. This application is accordingly dismissed as not

2/3 maintainable.

However, considering the amount of illicit liquor (15 litres) said to have been recovered, it is directed that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within two months from today and seeks regular bail, his application for regular bail shall be considered and disposed of on the same day. It is also indicated that defects, if any, shall be removed within two months from today.

Since there is a lockdown, the Court has considered it appropriate to adopt following procedure for communication of the present order:- (i) The order, which has been dictated during the course of the proceedings of virtual Court, shall be communicated to me on my e-mail I.D. by the Secretary. (ii) The corrected copy of the order shall be transmitted by me from my e-mail I.D. to the Secretary, which shall be treated to be the authentic copy of the order passed by this Court today in the present proceeding.

(iii) Hard copy of the order, duly signed by me, shall be preserved in my residential office for documentation and future use, if any.

(iv) Let a copy of the order be communicated to the

3/3 learned court below through e-mail or any other appropriate electronic mode by the Registry.

Let steps be taken by the Registry for uploading of the present order without compromising with the norms of social-distancing.

Rajesh/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) U T