Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30142/2017rejected

Ramji Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30142 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2016 Thana -PARSA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ramji Singh, Son of Punit Lal Singh, resident of Village- Pachlakh Tole Chainpur, P.S. Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Parsa P.S. Case No. 203 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The wife of the injured Shashi Bhushan Singh alleged that the accused persons having armed with different weapons came and Ramji Singh, the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Shashi Bhushan Singh with Dab sharp edged weapon on his head. Laxman Singh assaulted Shashi Bhushan Singh with Dab which hit on his hand. Nitish Kumar assaulted the husband of the informant with iron rod. The informant also sustained injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceeding under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30142 of 2017 (3) dt.21-08-2017 was going on. There is a bona fide land dispute between the parties. Shashi Bhushan Singh was examined but he did not make allegation against the petitioner.

It appears that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that the petitioner assaulted Shashi Bhushan Singh with Dab on his head. The order of learned Sessions Judge, Chapra shows that the injured got treated in Tata Hospital, Jamshedpur and the injury report shows that there was fracture of both temporal regions. There was fracture in nasal bone. The petitioner is author of the injury found on the head of the informant. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) KKSINHA/- U T