← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21373/2019dismissed

Mahesh Das v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-05Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21373 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL DistrictGaya ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Das aged about 70 years, male, Son of Kesho Das @ Keshav Das Resident of Village - Bhadeja, P.S.- Mufassil, Distt.- Gaya. 2.

Guddu Kumar, aged about 35 years, male, Son of Mahesh Das Resident of Village - Bhadeja, P.S.- Mufassil, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Jagannath Prasad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute between the parties whose lands are situated adjacent to each other. Co-accused Saraswati Devi has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Gaya.

4. Learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer, inviting reference to the same order of the learned Sessions Judge

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21373 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 in which several co-accused persons have been denied the privilege of anticipatory bail after gone through the case diary.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and the gravity of the offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T