← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23721/2026bail granted

Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23721 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Vijay Yadav Son of Shivaji Yadav Resident of Village- Saidnagar, Abhanda Dumduma, P.S.- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Das, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025 for the offence punishable under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 262, 263(a), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNS lodged on 04.01.2025 by the informant.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to be one of the members of unlawful assembly to assault the police who had gone to execute the warrant of arrest of coaccused, Jitendra Kumar. Accordingly, the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been lodged against fifteen named and 100-150 unknown persons and there is no allegation of any overt-act against the petitioner. It has next been submitted that a similarly

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23721 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3 situated person, namely, Triveni Yadav @ Triveni Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 14039 of 2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the police officials were prevented to execute his duties, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the nature of allegation and the petitioner is said to be one of the members of unlawful assembly, one of the similarly situated co-accused, namely, Triveni Yadav @ Triveni Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 14039 of 2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and this petitioner has got clean antecedent, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with aforesaid PS Case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23721 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3 well as the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his/their bail bonds.

(Ajit Kumar, J) perwez U T