Bachan Singh And ANR v. Shiv Shanker Singh And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20897 of 2010 ======================================================
1. Bachan Singh son of Late Suraj Singh
2. Vijay Bahadur Singh, son of Bachan Singh Both residents of village Barej, P.O.- Kauriram,P.S.- Mohania, DistrictKaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Shiv Shanker Singh, son of Sri Mahendra Singh
2. Amarendra Kumar
3. Dhirendra Kumar
4. Jainendra Kumar
5. Kaushlendra Kumar Sl. Nos. 2 to 5 sons of Shiv Shankar Singh
6. Sarvanath Singh @ Butan Singh, son of late Suraj Singh
7. Samsher Bahadur Singh
8. Sher Bahadur Singh Minor sons of Sarvanath Singh under the guardianship of their natural guardian and father namely Sarvanath Singh
9. Hari Shankar Singh
10. Kamala Pati Singh
11. Jai Prakash Singh Sl. Nos. 9 to 11 sons of Hanuman Singh
12. Raman Singh
13. Rahul Singh Both sons of Bijay Bahadur Singh
14. Prabhakar Singh
15. Pradeep Kumar
16. Madan Kumar All sons of Harishankar Singh
17. Prashant Kumar
18. Nishant Kumar
19. Guddu Sl. Nos. 17 to 19 minor sons of Kamalapati Singh, under the guardianship of their natural guardian and father namely Kamalapati Singh
20. Manish Kumar
21. Shashank
22. Punky All minor sons of Jay Prakash Singh under the guardianship of their natural guardian and father Jay Prakash Singh
23. Rama Shankar Singh, son of late Mahendra Singh
24. Aditya Kumar
25. Rajiv Kumar
26. Rajesh Kumar Sl. Nos. 24 to 26 sons of Rama Shankar Singh, residents of village Barej, P.O.- Kauriram, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhouri V.B.Srivastava
Patna High Court CWJC No.20897 of 2010 (4) dt.13-08-2015 2/2 For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 13-08-2015 Heard Mr. Akhauri Vipin Bihari Srivastava in support of the application.
This writ application is directed against the order dated 19.11.2009 passed by the Appellate Court in Title Appeal No. 35 of 2006/10 of 2009 whereby the Court has refused to formally amend the written statement said to have been filed by the petitioners. It is submitted that like the petitioners, defendant nos. 16, 17 and 18 also prayed for such amendment which was refused against which a writ petition being C.W.J.C. No. 2821 of 2011 was filed, which was dismissed on 9.5.2011 observing that the writ petitioner shall be entitled to make submission during the course of argument which the Court may consider after hearing the parties. He has sought permission of the Court to withdraw the application in the light of the said order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2821 of 2011 (Hari Shankar Singh and Ors versus Shiv Shankar Singh and Ors.) The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U