Nanosati Ice And Cold Storage P. v. The State Bank Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6223 of 2010 ======================================================
1. Nanosati Ice & Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. having its Office at Vill.- Nanosati, P.S.- Majhaulia, Distt.- West Champaran through its Managing Director, Subhas Prasad
2. Subhas Prasad S/O Shri Baijnath Prasad R/O Vill.- Nanosati, P.S. Majhaulia, Distt.- West Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Bank of India, A.D.B. Branch Bettiah through its Branch Manager
2. Chief Manager (Rural), State Bank of India, Region, Muzaffarpur
3. General Manager, Network I State Bank Of India, Head Office, Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800001
4. National Bank For Agriculture And Rural Development Maurya Lok Complex, Block No. B, 4th & 5th Floor, Dak Bunglow Road, Patna 800 001 Through Its Asstt. General Manager
5. District Horticulture Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran
6. The State of Bihar
7. New India Insurance Company, Branch Bettiah now at Motihari, Distt.- East Champaran through its Branch Manager
8. New India Insurance Company, Regional Office, Patna through the General Manager .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER ------------- 16-02-2015 In compliance of the order dated 18.11.2014, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.4, after service of its copy upon the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. In the aforesaid counter affidavit the claim raised on behalf of the petitioners has been disputed. However, despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the present writ petition. None appears on behalf of the respondents including the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4 either, although the names of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are
Patna High Court CWJC No.6223 of 2010 (4) dt.16-02-2015 2/2 printed in the daily cause list.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U