Kumar Dharmendra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17488 of 2010 =========================================================== Kumar Dharmendra S/O Udayanand Singh R/O Vill.- Kazi Hridayanagar, P.O.- Kajhi, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary Department Of Personnel And Administrative Reforms, Bihar, Patna

4. The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna

5. The District Magistrate, Madhepura

6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhepura

7. The Block Development Officer, Chausa, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (SC6) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitonerand counsel for the State.

The petitioner is challenging the order contained in Memo No. 729 dated 31.3.2010 passed by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhepura,, whereby and whereunder, his representation for claim of regularization in the service as well as payment has been rejected.

As per claim of the petitioner, he was discharging the work of Supervisor on daily wages under the Jawahar Rojgar Yojana but, that scheme has been closed in the year 2001 itself. As per order, it

Patna High Court CWJC No.17488 of 2010 dt.09-02-2018 appears that for whatever the amount he was entitled has been paid. So far the regularization in service is concerned, he was a Junior Engineer and appointment can be made only by the State Government and not by the officer of the State Government. In this case, the petitioner has failed to make out any case in his favour and, thus, this Court does not find any merit in the present writ application. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. However, if any vacancy is notified and the petitioner applies for the same, his case will be considered in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observation, this writ application is dismissed.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date13.02.2018 Transmission Date NA