Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17200/2017partly allowed disposal

Ruplal Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-01Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17200 of 2017 (4) dt.01-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17200 of 2017 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -215 Year- 2016 Thana -MADHUBAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== 1.Ruplal Paswan son of Inermal Paswan

2. Sanju Devi wife of Ruplal Paswan

3. Nitesh Kumar Paswan @ Nitesh Paswan Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar, son of Ruplal Paswan, All three resident of Village- Baramangaroo, P.S. Madhubani, District East Champaran

4. Subodh Paswan son of Sheetal Paswan

5. Sangeeta Devi wife of Subodh Paswan, both resident of VillageRaghunathpur, P.S. Kesaria, District East Champran

6. Chandeshwar Paswan son of Janki Paswan

7. Ramdulari Devi wife of Chandeshwar Paswan, Both resident of Village- Majhoulia, P.S. Pakari Deyal, District- East Champaran

8. Ramnath Paswan son of Jaleshwar Paswan

9. Rupkali Devi wife of Chandra Paswan, Both resident of VillageGopaiya, P.S. Shyampur Bhataha, District Shiohar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner No.1 Ruplal Paswan.

The prayer is allowed. The prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner No.1 Ruplal Paswan stands withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 9 apprehend their arrest in a case under

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17200 of 2017 (4) dt.01-07-2017 Sections 147, 149, 323, 379, 504, 506, 447 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dian Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant case is a counter blast of the earlier case filed by petitioner No.1 Ruplal Paswan against the husband of the informant. He further submits that the petitioners have clean antecedent and the allegations against the petitioner nos. 2 to 9 are ornamental in nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner nos. 2 to 9, namely, Sanju Devi, Nitesh Kumar Paswan @ Nitesh Paswan Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar, Subodh Paswan , Sangeeta Devi, Chandeshwar Paswan, Ramdulari Devi, Ramnath Paswan and Rupkali Devi, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest/surrender, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in Madhuban P.S. Case No.215 of 2016.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) KHAN/- U