Mohan Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24914 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Mohan Das S/O Late Sonu Das R/O Village-Duvaria Tilha, PS-Chakai, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Chakai P.S. Case no.90 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner took away his son for the purpose of working as a labourer. Thereafter he did not return. On search, he was found in an unconscious state with marks of injury on his body. On regaining consciousness he disclosed that he had been assaulted by the petitioner and others and they have taken away Rs. 45,000/- in cash.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24914 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is no eyewitness to the occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R. wherein the informant states that her injured husband disclosed that it was the petitioner who assaulted him leading to injuries as a result of which he had to be treated in the Department of Neurosurgery at RIMS, Ranchi and the nature of injury on his body was found to be grievous in nature, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T