Vinod Kumar Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23910 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-847 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== Vinod Kumar Chaubey S/O Late Ramjee Choubey @ Late Ram Jee Chaubey R/O Village- Balmikpur, P.S- Dhansoi, Dist.- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Chanchala Devi W/O Bipin Bihari Diwedi R/O Sohanipatti, P.S- Buxar Town, Dist.- Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Protest-cum-Complaint Case No. 847(c) of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and cognizance was taken under Sections 467, 468/34 of IPC. 3.The allegation against the petitioner is to cheat informant by creating forged document related with plot no. 389 of Mauza Pandeypatti, P.S. Buxar Town, District -Buxar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23910 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the purchaser of the land in issue after paying consideration amount. It is pointed out that the petitioner himself is the victim of circumstance. It is pointed out that out of family dispute with cousin brother, the petitioner was implicated with present case by informant without having no occasion. While concluding argument, it is submitted that the dispute is purely civil in nature, for which the present criminal case was completely unoccasioned. Petitioner said to be a man of clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of fact as the dispute primarily appears civil in nature, where petitioner is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Buxar/concerned Court,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23910 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 3/3 where the case is pending in connection with Protest-cumComplaint Case No. 847(c) of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T