Dhruv Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12345 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -250 Year- 2017 Thana -KURSAKANTA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Dhruv Kumar Verma, S/o Late Maksudan Lal Das, R/o Village- Madhubani Manjhali Chauk, P.S.- District- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kursakanta P.S. Case No. 250 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the written report it is alleged that this petitioner assaulted father of the informant with hard portion of bamboo indiscriminately on his head, on account of which, he became unconscious and fell down on the ground, who subsequently died on account of aforesaid injury. It is further alleged that when complainant came to save his father, then another co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his brother with Bamboo on his head and on back and wrist of brother of the informant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12345 of 2018 (3) dt.11-04-2018 2/2 Case diary has been received.

The postmortem report of father of the informant is available in the case diary wherein the Doctor has found multiple haematoma and abrasion on the head and the cause of death was opined to be due to above head injury.

Learned A.P.P. after perusing the case diary has submitted that other witnesses have also supported the case of the prosecution and have levelled specific allegation against the petitioner for assaulting the informant and his father. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail which will be considered by the court below in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T