Rina Kunwar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30467 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM RAIL P.S. District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Rina Kunwar, Wife of Late Dablu Sah.
2. Pappu Sah @ Pappu Khah, Son of Raj Nath Sah, Both Residences of Village- Dumaraith, P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Sasaram Rail P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioners are Gotni and Bhiasur of the deceased. The husband is already in custody. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against them.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30467 of 2017 (3) dt.25-07-2017 2/2 (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sasaram Rail P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Rail Court, Gaya subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (i) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (ii) petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (iii) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) sushma/- U T