Rahul Dom @ Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12353 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -205 Year- 2017 Thana -MAUZAHIDPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Rahul Dom @ Rahul Kumar, son of Mantu dom, resident of village Aligunj, Maheshpur (Babbargunj), P.S. Babbargunj, Distt. Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mojahidpur (Babbargunj) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that altercation took place between the informant and petitioner for pig. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant and his other family members. In paragraph-9 of the bail petition it is mentioned that injuries found on the person of the injured to be simple in nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12353 of 2018 (2) dt.28-02-2018 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Mojahidpur (Babbargunj) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T