Dinesh Kumar Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16712 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1158 Year-2016 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Ram, son of Harendra Ram, resident of Village- Pakari Kanth, P.S. Lalganj, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shobha Devi, Daughter of Shiv Chandra Ram, resident of Village- Sharma Amar, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anita Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. RAM SUMIRAN ROY ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16712 of 2018(2) dt.27-03-2018 2/2 present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali in connection with Tr. No. 2169 of 2018 (arising out of Complaint Case No. 1158 of 2016), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T