Abhay Kumar @ Bholu Vishwakarma @ Bhola v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23715 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Abhay Kumar @ Bholu Vishwakarma @ Bhola Son of Om Vishwakarma @ Umashankar Vishwakarma @ Umashankar Mistri Resident of MohallaRamana, Sherghatti, P.S.- Sherghatti, District- Gayaji ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2026 Heard Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 20.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. According to prosecution case, while the informant was walking in the garden, three accused persons on motorcycle overtook him and co-accused Danish Ekbal fired upon him due to which he received injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23715 of 2026(3) dt.09-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the petitioner was not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, namely, Vikky Kumar, Aashish Kumar, Piyush Kumar and Satish Kumar @ Chandan @ Chadiya and they have stated that the petitioner was involved in the present crime in question and he alongwith other co-accused persons have fired upon the victim and injury inflicted upon the injured person is grievous in nature caused by firearm injury.

5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State, on other other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Sherghati, Gayaji.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T