Md. Abdul Jahid Khan @ Md. Abdul Jahir Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23938 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Md. Abdul Jahid Khan @ Md. Abdul Jahir Khan S/o Md. Abdul Latif @ Md. Abdul Latif Khan @ Abdul Latif Resident of Village- Silampur Sardar Tola, P.S.- Kaliachak, District- Malda (W.B.) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with NDPS Case No. 68 of 2025 arising out of Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 286 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8/21(c)/22(c) of the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the bike of this petitioner, altogether 200 grams of smack like contraband was recovered. One mobile and train ticket were also recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23938 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/2 while making the seizure. He further submits that the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused namely, Ravi Kumar has been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 18661 of 2026. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.10.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with NDPS P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025 arising out of Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 286 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T