← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33349/2021allowed

Abhishek Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-22Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33349 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-790 Year-2020 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== ABHISHEK KUMAR @ GOLU Son of Ranjay Kumar @ Ranjay Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 40178 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-790 Year-2020 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== SHUBHAM KUMAR @ HITLAR Son of Mani Singh @ Mahindra Kumar @ Manindra Kumar Resident of Village- Amhara, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 33349 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Md.Shakir Ahmad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 40178 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.N.K. Agrawal, Sr.Adv.

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2022 Since both the cases arise out of Bihta P.S. Case No.790 of 2020, they have been taken up together. Heard both sides.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bihta P.S. Case No.790 of 2020 registered under Sections 307, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33349 of 2021(2) dt.22-03-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have committed no offence and have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners rather the specific allegation is against co-accused Amit Kumar.

Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. I, Danapur (Patna) in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.790 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T