← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22249/2019allowed

Dileep Chaudhary @ Dilip Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22249 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2017 Thana- DANDARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Dileep Chaudhary @ Dilip Choudhary, aged about 40 years, Gender- Male, Son of Late Jago Choudhari, Resident of Village-Ward No.4, Pirnagar, Sisauni, P.S-Dandari, District-Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 29 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation of firing is against Mithun Kumar Sharma, Ram Chandra Yadav and Chotu Kumar with allegation that they were the three persons who had made firing upon the deceased. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. There is no allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner is in jail since 15.01.2019.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22249 of 2019(4) dt.31-07-2019 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sushri Sweta Grewal, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III-cum-Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 29 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :

(1) On of the bailors would be close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable properties, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner will appear before the learned Court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

(3) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T