Dipak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29915 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1859 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Son of Mohan Rai R/o Village- Goriadera, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Arya For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence under Sections 380 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is alleged that this petitioner, who is son of informant in her absence, broke the lock of the room and took out valuable documents including cheque book and thereafter, transferred Rs. 12,50,000/- from the account of informant to his own account.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant at the instance of his elder brother. There is bitter relationship between the petitioner and his mother because petitioner's wife is not in good terms with the informant and as such, this false and concocted case has been lodged.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29915 of 2024(5) dt.19-08-2024 2/2

5. However, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner that he fraudulently transferred huge amount from the account of informant to his own account.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

7. Informant is none else but own mother of the petitioner and it is specific case of the informant that this petitioner transferred Rs. 12,50,000/- from the account of informant to his account without knowledge or consent of the informant.

8. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T