Ramel Industries Ltd . And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11828 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Ramel Industries Limited, Regd. Office - 15, Krishnanagar Road, Barasat, Kolkata - 7000126, Represented By Its Directors Namely As Follows
2. Mr. Rameswar Podder S/O Mr. Suresh Chandra Podder Residing At : Bhattrapally, P.O. - Barasat, Distt - North 24 Parganas, Kolkata - 700126, West Bengal
3. Mr. Ramendra Mohan Sarkar S/O Mr. Manindra Mohan Sarkar Residing At : Kumudnagar, P.O. - Ranaghar, Dist - Nadia, Kolkata - 741202, West Bengal
4. Mr. Sukanta Deb S/O Mr. Kamal Ranjan Deb Residing At : Sebagram Paltu, P.O. - Bengal Enamel, Dist - North 24 Parganas, Kolkata - 743122, West Bengal
5. Mr. Partha Das S/O Mr. Ajit Kumar Das Residing At : Sankalpa Residency, Chumari Para, Kadamtala, P.O. - Nawangunj, Dist - North 24 Parganas, Kolkata - 743144, West Bengal .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar , Represented By The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna - 800075
2. The State Of Bihar, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary (Home Department), Government Of Bihar
3. The State Of Bihar, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary (Finance Department), Government Of Bihar
4. The Director General Of Police, Nirman Nigam, Bmp 5 Campus, Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 28-03-2016 Despite repeated calls no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application. The counsel for the State who is present has drawn attention of the Court to the previous order dated 02.03.2016 which reads as under:- None for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is, however, present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11828 of 2013 (5) dt.28-03-2016 2/2 List this matter after three weeks. It will be open to the State respondents to utilize the time to file counter affidavit, if so advised. The application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U