Patna High CourtCWJC/16409/2014disposed

Manoj Kumar Singh And ANR. v. Bihar State Bar Concil And ORS.

2016-01-04Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.16409 of 2014 (2) dt.04-01-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16409 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar Singh son of Yogendra Narain Singh Resident of Village and P.O. Haripur, P.S. Sonebarsa, District - Saharsa, President of District Bar Association, Saharsa, P.O., P.S. and District - Saharsa.

2. Sudesh Kumar Singh son of Late Balmiki Prasad Singh Resident of Village and P.O. Sardiha, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa, General Secretary of District Bar Association, Saharsa, P.O., P.S. and District - Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Bihar State Bar Concil, Bar Council Bhawan, Patna through the President.

2. The President, Bihar State Bar Council Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Officiating Secretary, Bihar State Bar Council, Bar Council Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Executive Committee, Bihar State Bar Council, Bar Council Bhawan, Patna through the Secretary.

5. Sri Krishna Murari Prasad son of not known to the petitioners Convener, Election In Charge, District Bar Association, Saharsa, P.O. P.S. and District - Saharsa.

6. Sri Hem Kumar Jha son of not known to the petitioners

7. Sri Anand Singh Thakur son of not known to the petitioners

8. Sri Om Prakash Jha son of not known to the petitioners

9. Sri Amar Kishore Jha son of not known to the petitioners

10. Sri Chandra Bhushan Singh Chanchal son of not known to the petitioners Respondent nos. 6 to 10 are the Practicing Lawyer, District Bar Association, Saharsa, P.O., P.S. and District - Saharsa. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 04-01-2016 Counsel for the parties are present.

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by passage of time the issue raised in this application has been rendered infructuous by the holding of fresh election and in which circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of. (Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U