Dhumal @ Alok v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14221 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -223 Year- 2017 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Dhumal @ Alok, Son of Phuldeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Saraiya Ahir Toli, Ward No.2, P.O.- Saraiya Bazar, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 223/2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of abduction of daughter of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the girl is recovered and her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded, in which she has stated that as she was not happy with her matrimonial life, she had gone with the petitioner out of her own sweet will.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the statement of girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14221 of 2018 (2) dt.11-04-2018 2/2 below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Motihari, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 223/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T