Apsar Ansari @ Afsar Ansari @ Afasar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25289 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2025 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Apsar Ansari @ Afsar Ansari @ Afasar Ansari Son of Nejamuddin @ Nejamuddin Ansari R/o village Ramchandra, P.S.- Dhaka, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.10.2025, is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier moved for regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 88984 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected vide order dated 16.01.2026 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Learned counsel submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25289 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 that the charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 7.3.2026 would manifest from Annexure 4 of the regular bail application.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 345 of 2025.

7.

However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T