Raju Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26390 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Raju Singh S/O Brij Bihari Singh @ Bihari Singh R/O Vill.- Maikee, P.S.- Garakha, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State, learned counsel for the informant and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 118(1), 103(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons stabbed brother of the informant, leading to his death.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26390 of 2025(3) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. No specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. There is delay of two days in lodging the FIR. It is further submitted that specific allegation of stabbing is against co-accused, Gulshan Kumar. The petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T