Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49062/2012dismissed

Rana Singh @ Ranjit Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-04-30Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49062 of 2012 (2) dt.30-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49062 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Rana Singh @ Ranjit Singh S/O Ram Charitra Singh Resident Of Village- Malhipur, Police Station- Sahabpur-Kamal, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Prem Pankaj Singh S/O Ramanand Singh Resident Of VillageMolihipur, P.S.- Sahebpur-Kamal, District- Begusarai .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.07.2012 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge-I Begusarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 822 of 2011 arising out of S.Kamal P.S. Case No. 119 of 2010 for the offence alleged offences under Sections 302, 34 IPC.

2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called today.

3. According to the prosecution story that on 21.09.2010 at about 10:30 A.M. the father of the informant was plucking grass from the side of the road and the accused persons including the petitioner have abused and assaulted him with legs, fists and slaps. On alarm being raised the informant and his family members

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49062 of 2012 (2) dt.30-04-2015 came to rescue his father, where he was found unconscious and later on died.

The police after investigation has submitted charge sheet under Sections 302, 34 against the petitioner and other five accused persons.

4. It is well settled that at the stage of discharge the Court is not required to carry out a mini-trial, rather even strong suspicion against the petitioner is sufficient.

5. In this view of the matter, this Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order.

6. The petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T