Md. Jawed Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13474 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2016 Thana -DARBHANGA District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Md. Jawed Akhtar, Son of Md. Mustaquim, resident of Mohalla- Bhatiyari Sarai Darbhanga, P.S.- Town, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindeshwar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pronati Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 156 of 2016, registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga. The allegation of informant Samir Kumar Choudhary is that on 18.08.2016 Keshav Kumar, younger brother of the informant, informed that in course of going to the clinic of Doctor in the way his motorcycle was stopped by some persons and they assaulted him. Thereafter, he reached at main road of Professor Colony and saw that one person sitting on a motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR-07L-8891 and he come towards the his and gave knife blow causing injury on his back, head and right hand then

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13474 of 2017 (3) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 he fell down. The brother of the informant was also assaulted. Thereafter, he snatched Rs. 60,000/- from his pocket. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the motorcycle, which is detailed in the F.I.R. belongs to one Md. Idris and not to this petitioner. Further submission is that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Further submission is that in paragraph No.54 of the case diary the name of the petitioner and one Md. Raja have came hand in the occurrence. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trail Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T