Satyendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2347 of 2015 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar S/o Late Lal Deep Singh Yadav Resident of 'D' Type Quarter, Rajendra Agriculture University Campus, Pusa, Police Station Pusa, Distt. Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary Department of Disaster Management, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. District Magistrate, Samastipur

5. District Panchayati Raj officer, Samastipur

6. Additional Collector, Disaster Management, Samastipur

7. Sub - Divisional Officer, Samastipur

8. Block Development officer, Pusa Block, Samastipur

9. Circle officer, Pusa Block, Samastipur

10. Labour Enforcement officer, Pusa, Samastipur

11. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Mahamadpur Deopar, Pusa, Samastipur

12. Pradeep Mandal Son of Sri Chiranjeev Mandal, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Mahamadpur Deopar, Pusa, Samastipur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Utsav Kumar, AC to GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Utsav Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.11, appearing for the State respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw

Patna High Court CWJC No.2347 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U