Ajit Kr. @ Ajit Kr. Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26296 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2022 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajit Kr. @ Ajit Kr. Singh Son of Baban Singh Resident of Village- Gamhariya PS- Raxaul District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2026 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 25.11.2025 in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 557/2022, F.I.R. dated 22.11.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. According to prosecution case, when the informant went to the house of the co-accused, Baban Singh and demanded money for ploughing field he was abused. Upon objection, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons came out of their house variously armed and started assaulting the informant. When the informant's on intervened, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26296 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/3 petitioner stabbed him with knife in his stomach due to which he sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the informant's son, namely, Rajeev Kumar @ Sanjay Singh by means of knife in his abdomen and he has received the injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no intention to kill anyone and due to spur moment this present occurrence took place. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no repetition of blow on the son of the informant, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 557/2022, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26296 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 3/3 following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) atul/- U T