Shyam Bihari Gupta v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31871 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2016 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Shyam Bihari Gupta son of Shiv Narayan Sah, .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Indu Devi @ Bebi Devi D/o. late Shiv Prakash Sah, .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is husband of Opposite Party No.2. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 6 the petitioner has stated on oath that he is ready to keep his wife with all care and dignity.
In view of the averment of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31871 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas/Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.195 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned Court-below shall take step for amicable settlement of dispute. If the petitioner would be found cooperative and Opposite Party No.2 is found non-cooperative then provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner be confirmed other wise the learned Court-below shall pass order according to law. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T