← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7545/2009disposed

Dr.Rizwan Siddiqui v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-21Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7545 of 2009 ====================================================== Dr.Rizwan Siddiqui, son of late Md. Siddique, resident of Mohalla-Suratganj Dhobi Tola Ward No.8 P.S.-Sadar, District-Madhubani at present posted and working as senior reader in R.N. College Pandaul,District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna High Court

2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna High Court

3. L.N. Mishra University, Darbhanga through its Registrar.

4. The Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mishra University, Darbhanga.

5. The Registrar, L.N. Mishra University, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md.Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar (Gp8) For the University :

Mr. Arun Kumar Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 21-08-2018 It appears from the office note that in the order dated 30.3.2010 the case number was wrongly typed as C.W.J.C. No. 1545 of 2009 instead of C.W.J.C. No. 7545 of 2009. The same may be read as C.W.J.C. No. 7545 of 2009. The instant case was filed for a direction to the respondents to treat the age of superannuation of the petitioner as 65 years as the petitioner was working as Reader in Urdu in R.N. College Pandaul, Madhubani and in terms of UGC recommendation, the age of superannuation of the teachers was enhanced from 62 to 65 years.

The issue was finally adjudicated by the Apex Court

Patna High Court CWJC No.7545 of 2009(3) dt.21-08-2018 2/2 in the case of Jagdish Prasad Sharma vs. State of Bihar, (2013(8 SCC 633.

In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are hereby directed to treat the age of superannuation of the petitioner as 65 years and grant all consequential benefits.

Necessary decision as to the consequential relief may be taken by the respondents within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U