Sumit Poddar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3285 of 2014 ====================================================== Sumit Poddar S/O Ram Niranjan Poddar Bansal Tower, Flat No. 203, Block No.B, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar, Through The Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.
2. State Health Society Bihar, Through The Secretary, Health Society, Bihar Having Its Office At Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna- 800014
3. The Secretary Health Cum Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Having Its Office At Parivar Malyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna800014
4. The State Programme Officer, State Health Society, Bihar Having Its Office At Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna- 800014. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Jha, Advocate Mr. Narendra Pandey For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, AC to GA 12 For the State Health Society: Mr. Kishore Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shashi Shekhar, Advocate ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, leaned counsel for the State Health Society and learned counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing a part of the decision of the Technical Bid Scrutiny Committee dated 05.09.2013 of the State Health Society, Bihar by which the tender submitted by the petitioner has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the relevant agreement contemplated a period of one year for
Patna High Court CWJC No.3285 of 2014 dt.13-01-2016 completion of the work, which has already elapsed.
4. In that view of the mater, the prayer in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time and no positive relied can be granted at this belated stage.
5. The application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U