Rajesh Kumar @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26628 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2019 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== RAJESH KUMAR @ SONU Son of Indrdev Singh @ Inderdev Singh Resident of Village - Sat Kodariya, P.S. K. Nagar (Maranga O.P.), District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-11-2020 The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.

Let the defects be removed within two weeks of the start of the physical Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The FIR of the occurrence of robbery is against unknown. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Considering the remoteness of allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26628 of 2020(2) dt.04-11-2020 2/2 period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Falka Police Station Case No. 127 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T