Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32993/2017rejected

Sultan Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-21Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32993 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Sultan Paswan son of Sundar Paswan

2. Shiwanand Paswan son of Sundar Paswan

3. Umanand Paswan son of Sundar Paswan

4. Sunil Paswan son of Sultan Paswan

5. Kailu Paswan son of Bhumi Paswan

6. Pintu Paswan son of Bhumi Paswan

7. Bouku Paswan son of Sundar Paswan

8. Jhingaru Paswan son of Jagan Paswan

9. Gholta Paswan son of Bhumi Paswan All are residents of village - West Aurahi, P.S. - Simraha, Dist. - Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in Forbesganj P.S. Case No.184 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation accused persons including the petitioners came armed with lathi, Farsa, Sword, Bhala and began to assault the informant due to which the informant sustained injuries on his head and become unconscious. They have also assaulted and caused injuries to the family members

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32993 of 2017 (2) dt.21-07-2017 of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a case and counter case, injuries were simple in nature and they are aggressor and they wanted to capture the land In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioners surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the court below will pass an order on the same day on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order passed by this Court.

Vinay/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U T