← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8468/2019disposed

Amrendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-25Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8468 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Amrendra Singh Son of Late Raghunandan Singh Resident of VillageJamalpur, P.S.- Athmalgola, District- Patna. 2.

Nageshwar Singh Son of Late Raghunandan Singh Resident of VillageJamalpur, P.S.- Athmalgola, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

4.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna. 5.

The Additional Land Acquisition Officer, Patna. 6.

The Circle Officer, Athmalgola, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarvan Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subash Chandra Yadav (GP-15) Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, AC to GP-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This writ application has been filed seeking a direction the respondents to pay full and final amount of compensation for acquisition of their land under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. From the Annexures, which have been brought on record, it appears that award has been prepared and the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8468 of 2019(2) dt.25-04-2019 2/2 petitioners were asked to come forward to receive the award. From Annexure-3, it appears that the petitioner no. 1 has received the award and accordingly he has been asked to remove the structure from the said land, subject matter of acquisition. The petitioners, however, claim that the amount of compensation has not been paid to them.

There is nothing on record to substantiate the petitioners' claim that the amount, which has been paid is only part payment.

The relief, which the petitioners are seeking, cannot be granted. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the Land Acquisition Officer, Patna, to satisfy that the amount, which has been determined for payment has not been paid to them.

This application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Ashish/- U